Tuesday, December 6, 2016

REVISITING TWEET SHEET : Political Meddling



1) The man who okay'd killing of #ProfanityPeakPack also leading team on delisting of grizzly bears pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0 .@seattletimes

2) Head of interagency team on grizzlies: "biggest champion of black bears are black bear hunters." Just NO! pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0 

3) Mindset of co-chair on grizzly study team: "biggest champion of mountain lions are mountain lion hunters" pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0

4) Co-Chair of Interagency Grizzly Study Team ok'd killing of #ProfanityPeakPack, known for managing predators. pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0  

5) Why does the guy who ok'd killing of #ProfanityPeakPAck get to say whether protect grizzlies? .@freespeechtv pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0 

6) The man who authorized killing of #ProfanityPeakPack also leading team on delisting of grizzly bears pic.twitter.com/gizaBOOZg0 .@dodo




8) Meet team deciding on grizzly protection: trophy hunter, #ProfanityPeakPack killer, oil/gas company pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@EnviroNews

9) Why are these people the decision-makers on removing grizzlies from Endangered Species List? pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@freespeechtv @cnn

10) Meet the folks involved in removing protections for grizzlies: hunters and oil companies. pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@democracynow @latimes

11) Meet team overseeing grizzly delisting: trophy hunter, #ProfanityPeakPack killer, energy company pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@MotherJones

12) Meet team overseeing grizzly delisting: trophy hunter, #ProfanityPeakPack killer, energy company pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@GloriaDickie

13) Here is the team that gets to decide whether we continue protecting Yellowstone grizzly. pic.twitter.com/eXmmyhC7eH .@mtpublicradio @FLOTUS



14) .@USFWS handpicked peer reviewers then hired oil/gas/mining company to oversee peer review on grizzly delisting! pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

15) Peer review process for grizzly bear delisting reeks of conflicts of interest, political meddling! .@alfranken pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

16) Peer review process for grizzly delisting reeks of conflicts of interest, political meddling! .@SenAugustKing pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

17) How is this ok? Global energy company oversaw peer review for removing grizzly from ESA. .@KCWY13 @timkaine pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

18) Conflict of Interest: 3M acres by Yellowstone open for mining, fracking if grizzly loses protection .@NPRinskeep pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

19) How is this ok? Global energy company oversaw peer review for removing grizzly from ESA .@barbaraboxer @Interior pic.twitter.com/em7XtUuYeX

20) .@USGS played politics to hide info that showed grizzly bear delisting not appropriate .@thinkprogress @vox pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx

21) Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team delayed report by months, final report had glaring omissions .@Sen_JoeManchin pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx

22) .@USGS delayed annual report, omitted major info bc stats show grizzlies should not be delisted .@freespeechtv pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx

23) Why did .@USGS delay grizzly bear report by months, then omit several key statistics? .@HuffingtonPost @EcoWatch pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx

24Politics, not science! .@USGS delayed by months annual grizzly report, omitted critical info. @conservationmag pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx

25) Politics, not science, caused .@USGS to delay by months annual grizzly bear report, omit critical info. @UCSUSA pic.twitter.com/EE7JcSwJvx




26) Why oil/gas company, led by ex-Halliburton exec, overseeing peer review on grizzly delisting? .@RepRaulGrijalva pic.twitter.com/8ftKjkP8LM

27) Why is oil/gas company, led by ex-Halliburton exec, overseeing peer review on grizzly delisting? .@karinbrulliard pic.twitter.com/8ftKjkP8LM

28) Energy company has no business overseeing scientific peer review for grizzly delisting .@SenatorCantwell @kgwntv pic.twitter.com/8ftKjkP8LM

29) Energy companies shd not be involved in removing animals from Endangered Species list. Corrupt! .@hillaryclinton pic.twitter.com/8ftKjkP8LM

31) Energy company has no business overseeing scientific peer review for grizzly delisting .@MartinHeinrich @nytimes pic.twitter.com/8ftKjkP8LM

32) Govt agencies delayed annual report by months, final had major omissions. Reeks of political tampering. .@USGS pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk 

33) .@USGS delayed IGBST annual report by months, final had major omissions. Political tampering!? .@sensanders pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk

34) .@USGS delayed grizzly team report by months, final report had major omissions. Political tampering!? .@tomudall pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk

35) Why did .@USGS delay grizzly team report by months? Then omit major info? @barbaraboxer @POTUS @RepRaulGrijalva pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk

36) Why did .@USGS delay grizzly team report by months? Then omit major info? @thinkprogress @democracynow @reveal pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk

37) Why did .@USGS delay grizzly team report by months? Then omit major info? @RepHuffman @RepCartwright @mj_wright1 pic.twitter.com/h94kU4iozk





38) Per FOIA doc, .@USFWS handpicked "independent" scientists for peer review of grizzly delisting @SecretaryJewell pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6

39) FOIA doc reveals .@USFWS handpicked "independent" scientists for peer review of grizzly delisting! .@Interior pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6

40) FOIA doc shows .@USFWS handpicked "independent" scientists for peer review of grizzly delisting! .@RepLoisCapps pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6

41) Whoa! How is this "independent"? Conflict of interest at .@USFWS over grizzly removal from ESA. @nikkiinthehouse pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6

42) Yet again, .@USFWS engaging in politics not science. Handpicking peer reviewers=conflict of interest @jaredpolis pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6

43) FOIA doc reveals .@USFWS handpicked "independent" scientists for peer review of grizzly delisting! .@sciam pic.twitter.com/yXulIzGRV6




























No comments:

Post a Comment